Roof Replacement

Guest · Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 8:52 pm Post subject: Roof Replacement

Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 2:26 pm

If you are planning to replace your roof shingles, due to the latest hail storm, you must first get approval from the ECA-Architectural Committee.

You must submit a letter or email to the ECA-Architectural Committee requesting approval to replace your roof shingles prior to having your shingles replaced. The shingles must comply with Rule-8-1 of the Architectural Committee Policies & Rules. If you do not have a copy of the rules, a copy can be found on our website at eastwoodmwc.com

If you have any questions regarding the proper procedure for getting approval to replace your roof you can contact one of the members of the Architectural Committee listed below.

Dale Fredericksen
Steve Parrott
Charles Vassel

Thank you in advance for seeking approval to replace your roof.

Dale Fredericksen,
Chairman AC

Guest · Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 9:30 pm Post subject:

I live in the neighborhood and work for CRI Roofing. If anyone wants us to inspect your roof just give me a call.

Trent Gagnon
405/436-9766

Guest · Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:33 pm Post subject:

You guys are a buch of "Busy-Bodies" I'm sure good ole Christian folks! MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS! You don't pay our Mortgages, etc. You already have 2 lawsuit judgments against you, of which one is related to shingles.

Get A Life

The word is getting out in the community, "Don't move to Eastwood their HOA is to much to deal with.

You guys are doing a great job, keep up the great work!!

Guest · Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:14 pm Post subject:

As established by the most recent lawsuit and the results, it seems as though a resident does not need to get approval from the Architecture Committee, which by the way is not set up in accordance with the Eastwood Declaration. A judge rules in favor of the resident who did not submit for approval and did not comply with the guidelines for color of shingles.

Spikemax · Joined: 30 Jul 2009 Posts: 15

FYI, the Architectural Committee now has an architect on the committee, which is now in accordance with the Eastwood Directives. I do hope the lawyer who represented Eastwood is the last to be paid and has to wait until the Board has monies to do so. He has sure given them very bad advice. Of course he is the only one who has profited from recent lawsuits.

Guest · Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:06 am Post subject:

I would like for all the residents of Eastwood to know that we did have excellent legal representation. I don't think any other attorney in the city could have done any better. And, I have learned from prior experience, when you enter into any lawsuit there is always a chance you might lose. You never know what a Judge is going to do.

None of the Board member's wanted to do what was done. However, according to the Declarations, if someone doesn't comply with the rules you have two choices. You can either let it go, or you can pursue the violation. If the Board let it go, half the resident's would want to know why the Board didn't enforce the rules and the other half would want to know why the Board didn't drop it. It's a no win situation for the Board member's.

What would you have done??? I would like to know!!!

Furthermore, if we had won the case everyone in Eastwood would be patting the Board on the back for what a good job they did. However, because they lost, you treat the Board like a bunch of criminals.

If you don't like how the Board operates, then you need to get on the Board so you can do better job. But please don't criticize the Board member's for trying. They are resident's just like you, volunteering their time trying to do the best job possible

Thanks for your support.

Dale Fredericksen
Past President and Chairman of the AC
,

Guest · Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 6:31 pm Post subject:

I would think that if the attorney is so good he would have read all of the rules and determined that we could not win in either lawsuit. Having an architect on the committe does not meet all of the criteria. An alternate architect must also be back-up for the committee. It is stated in the Eastwood Declaration.
The board does not comply with all of the written rules, so how can the residents be expected to conform to all of the rules. Also it seems as though the board picks and chooses which rules to enforce and which residents to go after. Some residents get persecuted and others with the same violation go scott free. The people who suffer the most are the ones who do comply with all of the rules. What now happens to all of the approvals/disapprovals from the Architecture Committee that was not properly structured?

Guest · Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 8:38 am Post subject:

I know from past experience with my employment, that lawyers will accumulate as much insufficient time as possible to bill to their client. As the client you have no choice but to cooperate in hope you are successful with your case. There is no need to complain about the Board of Directors regarding lawsuits, the BOD are not responsible for the loss of their case and they have no choice but to pay the legal fees. There is nothing wrong with stressing a concern as a resident might have with the neighborhood, but let's not make those concerns into a nasty (who can say the most hateful thing) type of issue.

Guest · Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:15 am Post subject:

Check the court records we are paying more than legal fees.

Guest · Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 5:06 pm Post subject:

It is made to sound as if the Board of Directors is paying the bill for the lost lawsuit. In fact, every resident of Eastwood is paying the bill even though the decision to enter into a lawsuit we could not win was made by a Board of 9 people. The people of Eastwood had no choice in the matter.

Guest · Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 8:09 pm Post subject:

The board members REPRESENT the people of Eastwood - they were entrusted to serve in volunteer positions by the people of Eastwood and I can assure you work in the best interest of all.

Annette (past president of HOA)

Guest · Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 5:34 pm Post subject:

If the board members truly represent the majority of people living in Eastwood, why is it that the majority of people had no desire to file a lawsuit over the shingles on a roof? With that in mind, the board still made a decision to go forward with a lawsuit that will have to be paid for by the residents of Eastwood who were against the lawsuit in the first place. Board really has the best interests of our residents in mind when they make decisions. HA_HA!!!

Guest · Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 6:05 pm Post subject:

Majority of people elects a president but that doesn't mean that same majority necessarily like the policies pushed forward by the president and his/her party. If you had to ask 300 residents every time an issue came up not much would happen - or create a dicussion with maybe 200 million voters and ask what they think of a proposed health care reform (example.) Nothing would get done - that is why we have elections and people representing us?

Let us leave it at that - or call me; I really don't think this discussion need to continue on-line; thanks. - We have so much to be thankful for out here as well as living in a great little city and having our kids attend a wonderful school district.

Annette

Guest · Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:58 pm Post subject:

Hopefully the silent majority will show up at the yearly meeting in Sep.

	Eastwood HOA Forum Index -> Events/Announcements	All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1